Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1505ZA
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 02:29
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 178
2-Core 286
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 795
83% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 13F3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 12.2
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 25
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 669 477 689 694 776 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 662
Write 856
Mixed 580
SusWrite 651
155% 687 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 40.9
152% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 470
321% 394 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 129%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 26.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback