Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1505ZA
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 00:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 58.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
68% 126 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 692
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 72%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 13F3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 14.2
10% 14.6 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 0.2
10% 14.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 500 596 470 417 643 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 715
Write 792
Mixed 640
SusWrite 522
150% 668 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 25.6
96% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 259
204% 286 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 15.5" 1536 793 SDC4161
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback