Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory151.5 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 07:34
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 59.4
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 185
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 657
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 196
Parallax 183
144% 185 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 185
Splatting 128
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,571
Write 2,808
Mixed 2,867
685% 3,082 MB/s
4K Read 248
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 105
557% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 441
344% 478 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2073 2021 2071 2043 2016 2082 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 2,167
Mixed 2,080
SusWrite 2,051
478% 2,120 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 63
201% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 517
370% 480 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 296%
Great: 515%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 134 136 133 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 145
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 134
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
280% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 141 142 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 135
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 141
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 232 237 230 236 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 236 230 234 236 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Kingston 9965516-071.A0... 160GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 39
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 7.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23" 1280 720 DEL4099 DELL P2314H
Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $569
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback