Lenovo 10GRA01CPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10GRA01CPC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 01:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 87%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 92
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 291
36% 277 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 36.5
28% 39 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 25.3
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 145 327 371 412 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 363
Write 406
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 283
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 12.4
53% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 43.7
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 16.9
16% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 25% 32 211 58 60 19.4" 1280 720 ACR0498 Acer K202HQLA
Typical 10GRA01CPC Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10GRA01CPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback