Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15-W9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15-W9  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 23:55
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 638
63% 513 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 3490) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 96.5
Parallax 90.2
71% 91.3 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 80
Splatting 81.5
77% 96.4 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB
258GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 1288 1209 1332 1332 1316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,376
Write 1,745
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 1,306
385% 1,723 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 46
159% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 231
227% 381 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 244%
Great: 431%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 401 381 411 414 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 498
Write 417
Mixed 408
SusWrite 404
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 32
110% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 206
141% 175 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1372 1561 1550 1549 1585 1459 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,344
Write 1,662
Mixed 1,460
SusWrite 1,513
390% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 43.2
149% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 204
211% 365 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 252%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown J642GU42J9266NF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.8
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 26.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 31% 26 472 347 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05E8
History: Score 27: 0P 3R 3G 3B | Score 22: 0P 1R 5G 2B
Typical GA-AORUS 15-W9 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15-W9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback