Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 17:39
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 185
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 432
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 1653) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.3% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 80.3
62% 83.5 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 77.1
Splatting 81.1
67% 81.5 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,859
Write 1,763
Mixed 1,204
358% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 55.8
184% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 659
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 626
459% 604 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
36GB free
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 895
Write 1,417
Mixed 932
243% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 48.7
156% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 598
463% 636 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 066D TN416G26D819-SB 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 144 15.5" 1920 1080 LGD05C0
Typical GA-AERO 15XV8 Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback