Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 15:08
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 504
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1653) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 97.6
Parallax 7.1
5% 37.1 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,552
Write 1,425
Mixed 1,161
307% 1,379 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 51.4
170% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 604
453% 606 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
118GB free
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1284 1331 1455 1240 997 1062 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 932
Write 1,400
Mixed 939
SusWrite 1,228
255% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 45
142% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 588
444% 599 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 184%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 066D TN416G26D819-SB 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1920 1009 LGD05C0
Typical GA-AERO 15XV8 Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback