Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '23 at 09:50
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150 5,211 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 43.9 2-Core 80.1 43% 65.5 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 146 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.1% Average	Lighting 59.2 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 81.5 48% 66.9 fps	MRender 58.8 Gravity 63.1 Splatting 45.9 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR054 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 60 59 102 89 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 363 Write 316 Mixed 300 SusWrite 69.2 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 13.5 71% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 91.7 DQ Mixed 1.1 18% 40 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 20GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 61 103 89 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 145 Write 90.8 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 70.4 59% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46 4,039 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 8GB free Firmware: P22OA70A SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 25 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 67.3 Write 20.1 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 25 25% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 86GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 25 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 68.5 Write 60.2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 25 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 20,728 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 10.6 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	32	11	60	21.5"	1920 1080	AOC2201 22E1W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16