Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 341
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 64.1
52% 66.5 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 63.8
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 34 45 64 68 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 288
Write 65.6
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 55.8
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 66.2
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 51.3
38% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO71ED
Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback