Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IC
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 184
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 343
41% 314 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11DC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 6
3% 34.3 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 592 613 719 834 610 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1522
Write 1,131
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 649
243% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 41.1
143% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 312
226% 297 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 158%
Great: 313%
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
42GB free
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 182 173 182 184 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 873
Write 410
Mixed 302
SusWrite 186
97% 443 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 30.4
115% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 227
169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 21
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback