Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 222
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 591
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 8
5% 28.9 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 418 453 457 57 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 466
Mixed 429
SusWrite 315
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 40.6
134% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 348
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 20.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO71ED
Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback