Biostar H61MHV2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV2  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 440
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 222
Write 208
Mixed 193
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 27.8
95% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 37.9
35% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
512GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.5
Write 66
Mixed 50.2
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
297GB free
Firmware: 4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54
Write 28.7
Mixed 22.7
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 54%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
605GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 55
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.7
39% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 0100 Atermiter9.A01LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 10% 10 187 15 60 0" 1360 768
Typical H61MHV2 Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback