Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 183 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 454 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.7% Average	Lighting 51.6 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 72.8 42% 61.2 fps	MRender 59.6 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 36.7 41% 52.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$78 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 343GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 313 332 337 331 340 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 402 Write 336 Mixed 270 SusWrite 330 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 33.9 119% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 264 224% 327 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 12GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 384 Write 405 Mixed 380 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 43.9 145% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 357 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 509GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 25 31 29 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 106 Write 13.5 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 28.1 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 7.7 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	30	60	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2402 24G2W1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	130x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16