Asrock B85M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 87.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 225 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 607 62% 500 Pts	64-Core 605 38% 605 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 42.9 Parallax 39.8 32% 40.6 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 28.6 28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB 43,498 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 212 211 213 208 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 380 Write 358 Mixed 239 SusWrite 216 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 33.5 110% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 91.6 DQ Mixed 43.1 38% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 114%
ACER Hard Drive 500GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 379GB free, PID 2021 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 73 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 74.2 Write 62.1 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 72.6 82% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 18.6 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	22"	1280 720	FUJCB11 VL-222SSW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-HDS Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-HDS - $88

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	62x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	37x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 5,025 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16