Lenovo 20ARS00Y00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20ARS00Y00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS00Y00
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140520
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 102
49% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 128
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-wave(s) 256G 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12695
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 205 273 198 192 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61% Good
Read 323
Write 241
Mixed 320
SusWrite 224
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 21.4
78% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 248
182% 239 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61%
Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
195GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 35 36 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 35.9
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 34
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 26 60 14" 1600 837 LEN40A1
Typical 20ARS00Y00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ARS00Y00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback