Fujitsu ESPRIMO_D556

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO_D556  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3430-A1
Memory0.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 11:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 125
45% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 358
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 7
0% 4.07 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 13 18 17 17 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
305GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 81 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 83.4
Write 106
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 78.9
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6H1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 1,050
4% 1,050 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 25 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACR0503 R221Q
Typical ESPRIMO_D556 Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO_D556

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback