Asus PRIME B660-PLUS D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B660-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 01:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 176
2-Core 320
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 955
94% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 196
Parallax 214
172% 207 fps
MRender 302
Gravity 168
Splatting 125
154% 198 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3565
Write 3590
Mixed 2,327
704% 3,161 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 81.5
276% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,424
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 1,311
977% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 537%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC64
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 145
Mixed 74.8
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160U 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 4R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 38% 29 203 31 60 23.6" 1920 1080 MSI1462 Optix G241VC
Typical PRIME B660-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 6,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B660-PLUS D4 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback