Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 100
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 590
56% 465 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 177F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 6.2
5% 26.3 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 773 884 836 708 721 807 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,579
Write 1,075
Mixed 980
SusWrite 788
247% 1,106 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 68.5
232% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 263
313% 539 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 214%
Great: 247%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
636GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 1183 1153 1289 957 1569 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 2,028
Mixed 1,741
SusWrite 1,175
372% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.5
218% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1039
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 1,102
767% 963 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 245%
Great: 365%
ST2000LM007-1R8174 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: T0824A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 133 116 56 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62% Good
Read 432
Write 375
Mixed 338
SusWrite 101
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 22.2
96% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 41.7
81% 158 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 20 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback