Lenovo 4352H4U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics280% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemLenovo 4352H4U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 573
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Asus(1043 88E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
280% Outstanding
Lighting 366
Reflection 472
Parallax 797
298% 545 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 581
Splatting 313
373% 476 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 280%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 445 449 466 467 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 460
Mixed 413
SusWrite 454
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 40.4
130% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 320
240% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
17GB free, PID 1009
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 9 9 9 9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 8.9
8% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
25% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ- 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 36.6
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0B45 S24D300
Typical 4352H4U Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4352H4U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback