Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 07:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 114
44% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 154
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E20) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 11.3
6% 8.97 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 7.6
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN10MA22SCY512YMNV 512GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220902a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 648 812 576 541 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 575
Mixed 494
SusWrite 573
119% 526 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 26.1
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 236
176% 234 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 299%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
584GB free
Firmware: JA0OA480
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 22 21 23 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 20
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 21.4
10% 14 MB/s
4K Write 0.1
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 19.7" 1280 720 LEN61E0 D19-10
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback