Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 500 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 44.3 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 125 44% 79 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 226 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 4 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G 128GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 110 104 104 105 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 323 Write 180 Mixed 239 SusWrite 109 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 29.5 108% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 151 148% 236 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MSH64V4H 1x4GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	39	60	27"	1366 745	PHLC156 PHL 273V7

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver J5040IntelBench 41%, 500 samples	20x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	19x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	2x
850 Pro 128GBSamsung $65Bench 99%, 18,195 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 2x16GBCorsairBench 25%, 4 samples	3x
2400 C15 Series 2x8GBPatriotBench 72%, 960 samples	2x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 1x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 31 samples	1x