Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X12DAi-N6
Memory1008.4 GB free of 1024 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6342
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 769
68% 576 Pts
64-Core 3,441
213% 3,441 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
885GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4174 4288 3769 2974 3052 2840 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
465% Outstanding
Read 2,508
Write 4,033
Mixed 2,927
SusWrite 3,516
738% 3,246 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 103
329% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 1,079
797% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 465%
Great: 591%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
52GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 48.2
Mixed 67.8
105% 103 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
121% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40BB4-CWE 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
278% Outstanding
MC Read 109
MC Write 140
MC Mixed 105
338% 118 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 11.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 278%
Great: 632%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $591
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback