Intel S1200SP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel S1200SP  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
58% 109 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 506
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RAGNWA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 122 140 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 109
Write 170
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 138
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
265% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 111%
Netac OnlyDisk 16GB
3GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,049
Mixed 7.8
1,009% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Mixed 0
96% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S16GE24A8 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 5.1
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 11% 18 194 32 0 0" 1296 768
Typical S1200SP Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Intel S1200SP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback