MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive405% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 18:43
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 100
1-Core 148
2-Core 325
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,054
99% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,478
92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 295
Parallax 208
148% 228 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 188
Splatting 129
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3871 1107 727 708 711 712 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 4,192
Write 4,059
Mixed 2,446
SusWrite 1,306
670% 3,001 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 96
328% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,242
933% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 405%
Great: 463%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 476 476 477 476 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 476
Mixed 446
SusWrite 476
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 56
194% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 294
243% 349 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 127%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
160GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 303 305 304 303 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,459
Write 1,465
Mixed 1,293
SusWrite 480
315% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 85
291% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,203
DQ Mixed 1,001
779% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 266%
Great: 280%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
432GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 89 87 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 85
Write 83.5
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 87.9
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 63%
Netac OnlyDisk 16GB
14GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 14.5
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4000 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 58.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 46
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 36.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 43
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 35.6
112% 35.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback