Acer Swift SFX14-42G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Swift SFX14-42G  (all builds)
MotherboardBC Orion_BCU
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 04:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 67.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 324
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1067
103% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,211
75% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1628) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.22
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 53.3
46% 57.2 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 48
Splatting 49.5
40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1992 1827 655 677 683 658 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2299
Write 2,234
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 1082
404% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 67.4
219% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,045
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 964
720% 958 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 269%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 28
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1280 720 AUO683D
Typical Swift SFX14-42G Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFX14-42G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback