Gigabyte GA-H610M H DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H610M H DDR4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 18:14
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 171
2-Core 296
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 909
86% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,164
72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2160 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 58
Parallax 51.5
27% 47.6 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 40.4
36% 45.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 76 46 62 46 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 389
Write 147
Mixed 104
SusWrite 65.7
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 16.9
77% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 6.2
45% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K9CXF2-MIE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MSI G273Q
Typical GA-H610M H DDR4 Builds (Compare 2,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H610M H DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback