HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory87.6 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 653
61% 505 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 116
Parallax 118
103% 121 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 101
Splatting 89
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTPSN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 204 193 193 194 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 209
Write 187
Mixed 207
SusWrite 195
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 18.5
55% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 178
132% 176 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 106%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
343GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 327 324 331 333 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 349
Write 316
Mixed 335
SusWrite 329
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 33.8
109% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 316
237% 316 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 128%
Seagate DKS2C-H2R0SS 2TB
515GB free
Firmware: 5C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 100
Write 34.7
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 39.4
39% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 50%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
249GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 104 101 104 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 104
68% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate DKS2P-H2R0SS 2TB
157GB free
Firmware: 5C09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 81 79 78 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 95.4
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 78.8
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B1G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B1G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B1G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B1G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B1G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 2C 18JSF1G72PZ-1G6D1 ID:80 2C ... 130GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 8 60 23" 1280 720 HWP281C HP w2338h
Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback