Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory244.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 16:31
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w5-3435X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 52.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 273
79% 154 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,033
95% 797 Pts
64-Core 2,752
170% 2,752 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$273
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2055 2104 2049 2068 2221 2354 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,898
Write 2,509
Mixed 1,896
SusWrite 2,142
530% 2,361 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 53
175% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 634
473% 636 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 329%
Great: 926%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 95.4
Mixed 105
178% 174 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 2.7
642% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 3.2
909% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36
Write 8
Mixed 12.7
19% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M321R8GA0BB0-CQKEG 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4812 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
161% Outstanding
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 72.8
MC Mixed 63.2
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 161%
Great: 253%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 21 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 329%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 429%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,949
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback