Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GM
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '23 at 13:13
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	KNA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 168 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 392 44% 343 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B9E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.37% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 6.3 5% 27.3 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 9.3 7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.37% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1005 841 854 837 858 861 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 1,462 Write 1,998 Mixed 1,356 SusWrite 876 321% 1,423 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 59.1 190% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 594 DQ Write 470 DQ Mixed 542 403% 536 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 340%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 444GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 137 136 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 144 Write 152 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 135 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 04CD F4-2666C18-8GRS 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.4% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 20.3 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 21.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	120	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	371x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	169x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	276x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	264x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	102x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	93x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	36x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	79x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	68x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16