PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Veriton M6610 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Veriton M6610 |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110726 |
Uptime | 5.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 19 '23 at 12:05 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
63.8%
Good
|
62% 102 Pts
|
36% 266 Pts
|
14% 230 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.8%
Average
|
49% 61 fps
|
51% 62.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 830 256GB-$261
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 96 66 50 42 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
33% 146 MB/s
|
56% 19.3 MB/s
|
90% 144 MB/s
|
![]() |
52.3%
Above average
|
62% 84 MB/s
|
165% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
463GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 72 72 73 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
47% 64.5 MB/s
|
168% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
28.8%
Poor
|
26% 9.1 GB/s
|
27% 9.3 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 67 | 54 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0F94 U32R59x |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 10x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 7x |
Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 6x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $70 |