Acer Veriton M6610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M6610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 12:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 143
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 265
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 58.8
49% 61 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 58.2
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 96 66 50 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 197
Write 165
Mixed 140
SusWrite 80
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 12.8
56% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 99.6
90% 144 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
298GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 94 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 90.8
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 92.4
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
463GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.8
Write 68.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 72.4
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F94 U32R59x
Typical Veriton M6610 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback