bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 09:45
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3380M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 151
58% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 203
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 3
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600/256G 256GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 218 214 221 226 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.5% Above average
Read 251
Write 229
Mixed 225
SusWrite 220
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 12.5
94% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 16.2
47% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
120GB free
Firmware: AX002M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 69 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 52.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 70.4
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 54%
USB DISK 30X 8GB
2GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 8
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 3.1
18% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5594-003.A00LF 9905594-008.A00LF 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD02DC
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback