Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 04:25
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 170
2-Core 330
105% 196 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 864
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 183
Parallax 204
151% 191 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 159
Splatting 132
131% 165 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,222
Write 3,946
Mixed 2,912
822% 3,693 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 82.9
308% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1502
DQ Write 1,229
DQ Mixed 1,339
1,010% 1,357 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
WDC WD20EZBX-08AYR 2TB
866GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 184 187 186 186 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 231
Write 160
Mixed 122
SusWrite 187
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.3
30% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20EZBX-08AYR 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 229 235 232 233 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 250
Write 208
Mixed 129
SusWrite 234
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1.3
33% 9.57 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 35.5
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 37.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3206 G32QC A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback