Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 167
2-Core 322
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 861
87% 708 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 165
Parallax 167
136% 166 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,646
Write 3,769
Mixed 2,802
760% 3,406 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 80.9
295% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,445
DQ Write 1,222
DQ Mixed 1,329
997% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
WDC WD20EZBX-08AYR 2TB
866GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 190 188 186 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 226
Write 209
Mixed 128
SusWrite 188
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.3
33% 9.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 1
3% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20EZBX-08AYR 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 234 236 235 235 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 257
Write 228
Mixed 146
SusWrite 235
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.1
30% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 1.2
3% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 35.3
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 37.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3206 G32QC A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback