Lenovo 20W6001LUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20W6001LUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20W6001LUS
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 03:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 241
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 406
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 22CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 9.3
18% 18.2 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 12.7
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1281 1227 1447 1556 1233 659 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1935
Write 1,797
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 1,234
357% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 73.1
292% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,106
802% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 286%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 13.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20W6001LUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20W6001LUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback