Gateway NE56R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGateway NE56R  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway EG50_HC_HR
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '17 at 01:51
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 103
53% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 167
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0649) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2653
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.58 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.52
4% 4.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 49.4
Write 46.6
Mixed 21.3
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.09
40% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 Adata 6GB
666, 666 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NE56R Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway NE56R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback