Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 98.7
1-Core 193
2-Core 382
120% 224 Pts
4-Core 734
8-Core 1,364
125% 1,048 Pts
64-Core 1,715
106% 1,715 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 231
Parallax 151
146% 187 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 150
Splatting 130
124% 156 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 131%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 271 213 208 203 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 222
Mixed 236
SusWrite 223
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 37
155% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 195
173% 264 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 128%
Corsair MP400 1TB
417GB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 938 257 513 587 340 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1022
Write 1,338
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 466
221% 978 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 72.4
272% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 1,478
DQ Mixed 936
762% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 202%
Great: 308%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 193 194 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 160
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 194
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.47312H.004 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
211% Outstanding
MC Read 79.9
MC Write 68.6
MC Mixed 80.6
218% 76.4 GB/s
SC Read 66.2
SC Write 68.9
SC Mixed 65.2
191% 66.8 GB/s
Latency 42.5
94% 42.5 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 211%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 240 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25B3 XG258
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $2,125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback