Sony SVP13219PGB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVP13219PGB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime31.7 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 09:28
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 120
54% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 137
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90B6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 3.4
1% 2.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 198 51 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42% Average
Read 324
Write 178
Mixed 217
SusWrite 102
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 19
62% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 91.2
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 80.4
60% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 42%
Great: 103%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 256GB
44GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 232 228 207 187 257 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 280
Write 281
Mixed 190
SusWrite 226
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 15.2
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.6
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 65.2
52% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 11.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 30 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0F9D C27R502
Typical SVP13219PGB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVP13219PGB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback