User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIPASON
MotherboardIPASON B550M
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 21:40
Run Duration76 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 930
98% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 89.4
54% 73 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 47.4
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pd350 512GB M2(nvme) 512GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220902a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2200
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,843
466% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 77.5
251% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 928
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 632
564% 848 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 250%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 30
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 31.5" 1280 720 JRY2380 HDMI
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback