Casper NIRVANA ONE A700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper NIRVANA ONE A700  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER H510DT 001
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 59
1-Core 137
2-Core 227
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 649
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Device(1C6C 042D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 9.6
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 0
5% 6.83 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 275 42 54 370 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1361
Write 1,803
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 176
273% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 63.6
211% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 930
713% 972 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 175%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS632A.M4FF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 12
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 24.1" 1920 1080 SKM9322
Typical NIRVANA ONE A700 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA ONE A700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback