bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 18:41
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 178
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 470
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 31.9
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 33.8
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 170
Mixed 135
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 5.28
4K Mixed 0.84
217% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate FreeAgent Pro 320GB
298GB free, PID 3010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 26.1
Mixed 15.8
29% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
148GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 90.2
Mixed 79.1
109% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 44%
Generic USB SD Reader 16GB
15GB free, PID 9102
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 10.5
Mixed 9.21
14% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.81
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.006
11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback