Pcspecialist Elimina V 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Elimina V 15  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NPxxRNxS
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 66.7
1-Core 193
2-Core 380
109% 213 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 996
105% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,624
100% 1,624 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5630) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 53
Parallax 5.1
4% 20.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.9
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S250G 250GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 186 74 100 103 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 635
Mixed 368
SusWrite 135
126% 572 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 97.3
250% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 120
215% 442 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 163%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2933C19S2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elimina V 15 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Pcspecialist Elimina V 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback