HP Laptop 15-dw0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-dw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85EF
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 06:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 76.3
40% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 191
18% 147 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 85EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VTP512GSSD4 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0523B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 101 21 421 76 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 1,056
Write 823
Mixed 701
SusWrite 209
155% 697 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 14.2
78% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 213
164% 224 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 234%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 135
Write 114
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 105
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-dw0xxx Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-dw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback