Medion MD34040/2520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34040/2520  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 782
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 88.6
Parallax 82.5
74% 87.2 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 71.8
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 152 64 277 126 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 838
Write 560
Mixed 592
SusWrite 192
121% 545 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 42.8
150% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 328
275% 388 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 110%
Great: 157%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
629GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 181 185 184 187 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 166
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 181
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 04CD F4-3200C16-16GIS 24GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34040/2520 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34040/2520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback