Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 23:08
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 207
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 440
54% 413 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 101
Parallax 120
94% 112 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 85.9
79% 98.1 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
634GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 43 52 69 32 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 389
Write 327
Mixed 247
SusWrite 50.4
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 11
43% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 30.3
41% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 106%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 1464 1508 1590 1615 1473 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,609
Mixed 1,636
SusWrite 1,491
363% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 56.7
180% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 628
468% 624 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 244%
Great: 477%
Md4000gsa6472dvr 0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAONS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 119 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 145
Write 150
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 119
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback