Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 207
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 616
60% 493 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 113
Parallax 124
102% 121 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.1
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 59 1.7 30 32 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 298
Write 202
Mixed 279
SusWrite 42.3
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 10
42% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 39.4
DQ Mixed 29
32% 57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 106%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1675 1714 1758 1767 2003 2010 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,826
Write 1,672
Mixed 1,683
SusWrite 1,821
395% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 46.1
168% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 749
543% 707 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 266%
Great: 477%
Md4000gsa6472dvr 0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAONS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 117 118 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 117
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $745
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback