Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	9.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 260 5,317 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 55.6 33% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 54.1 8-Core 56.8 7% 55.4 Pts	64-Core 49.5 3% 49.5 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	9.5% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 18.1 9% 15.7 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 11.9 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB 2,171 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 566GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 85 96 95 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 168 Write 147 Mixed 158 SusWrite 83.3 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 14.2 48% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 118 89% 119 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 115%
Ct2000bx 50 2TB 239 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2TB free Firmware: M6CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 86 96 95 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 160 Write 131 Mixed 144 SusWrite 84.2 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 9.6 40% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 27.3 45% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 126GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 87 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 98.4 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 83.5 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR4GU16H2568-33 00 GR4GU16H2568-33 00 GR4GU16H2568-33 00 GR4GU16H2568-33 00 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.8 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	8x
Phenom II X6 1065TAMDBench 55%, 1,141 samples	2x

SSD
X1 SSD 120GBDrevoBench 62%, 1,961 samples	1x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GBHynixBench 50%, 279 samples	1x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 32%, 217 samples	1x
99U5595-005.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 43%, 189 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16