Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 25.4
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 62
23% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 96.4
8-Core 101
13% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 9.1
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GEONIXGOLD256 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 260 309 305 363 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 320
Write 265
Mixed 266
SusWrite 289
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 12.2
63% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 30.1
59% 114 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
822GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 133 132 137 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 97.2
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 133
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C HMT351U6EFR8C 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 283
14% 283 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-S1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback