Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605VC
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 21:43
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 172
2-Core 309
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 937
97% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 18B3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.8% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 54.3
41% 52.1 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 49.4
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1480 1602 1657 1731 1758 1162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,943
Write 1,714
Mixed 1,390
SusWrite 1565
371% 1,653 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 81.1
290% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 1,041
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 844
606% 794 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 297%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 30.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback