Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605VC
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 19:52
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 188
2-Core 374
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,047
102% 836 Pts
64-Core 1,601
99% 1,601 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 18B3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 59
45% 56.3 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 53.6
41% 49.1 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1367 1407 1497 1493 1527 747 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,708
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 1,340
347% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 90
302% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 816
604% 810 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 280%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 32.2
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback