Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 21:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 153
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 267
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2025 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 40.7
32% 41.5 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 30.2
21% 23.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 220 68 59 60 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 240
Write 220
Mixed 193
SusWrite 99.1
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 18
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 43.9
47% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback